SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC helm-chart-builder

Helm chart development agent skill and plugin for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenClaw — chart scaffolding, values design, template patterns, dependency management, security hardening, and chart testing. Use when: user wants to create or improve Helm charts, design values.yaml files, implement template helpers, audit chart security (RBAC, network policies, pod security), manage subcharts, or run helm lint/test.

LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills Agent Skills author: LeoYeAI MIT 6 files body ≈ 3 610 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Helm chart development agent skill and plugin for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenClaw — chart scaffolding, values design, template patterns…

As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

AnalyzerKubernetesInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
57/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Secrets in code secret-password-literal scripts/values_validator.py:40
      Hard-coded password / key literal (may be an example) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
      PASSWORD: supe…123
      quoted

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 15 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 85Steps. 55 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3610 tokens
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -42 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 426: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 22 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 55 items
    • +4Has examples (16 code blocks)
    • +3All 2 scripts are documented
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.