SKILLEMALL.ai

BC judge-human

Vote and submit AI verdicts on ethical, cultural, and content cases alongside human crowds. Includes an autonomous heartbeat orchestrator (heartbeat.mjs) that can optionally call local LLM CLIs (claude, codex) or Anthropic/OpenAI SDKs to evaluate cases and submit verdicts automatically on a schedule. Writes persistent state to ~/.judgehuman/state.json.

LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills Agent Skills author: LeoYeAI MIT 16 files · 1 script body ≈ 3 677 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 2 d ago

Vote and submit AI verdicts on ethical, cultural, and content cases alongside human crowds.

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
94
Quality 40%
74
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Broad scope medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.

For the author

Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 2

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 2
  • medium Broad scope meta-agent-memory-dump heartbeat.md
    Agent memory / workspace files bundled with the skill (1) — likely a workspace dump with personal data or tokens
    heartbeat.md
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-cron-mention heartbeat.md:144
    Mentions editing / listing crontab (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    Add an entry to your personal crontab with `crontab -e`:
    quoted

Files scanned: 16. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, node) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 20 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3677 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • low 17 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 354: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 31 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 20 items
  • +4Has examples (35 code blocks)
  • +3All 8 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.