SKILLEMALL.ai

BC mantis-manager

Manage Mantis Bug Tracker (issues, projects, users, filters, configs) via the official Mantis REST API. Supports full CRUD operations on issues, projects, users, attachments, notes, tags, relationships, and configuration management. Features dynamic instance switching with context-aware base URL and token resolution.

LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills Agent Skills author: LeoYeAI MIT 3 files body ≈ 6 297 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 2 d ago

Manage Mantis Bug Tracker (issues, projects, users, filters, configs) via the official Mantis REST API.

As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

IntegrationWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
85/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
62
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
60/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 6297 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 608): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 50 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 6297 tokens
  • 85Steps. 193 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • low 17 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • -236 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 318: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 101 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 193 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (90 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 62.