SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AD openai-codex-multi-oauth

Manage and debug multiple OpenAI Codex OAuth profiles inside OpenClaw, including native multi-profile auth stores and external-router setups where one active slot is backed by a repository of multiple OAuth identities. Use when fixing Codex profile switching, session `authProfileOverride` sync, `/status` or usage mismatches, auth.order behavior, active-slot routing, broken-token recovery, or same-email different-account/workspace selection bugs.

LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills Agent Skills author: LeoYeAI MIT 6 files body ≈ 1 280 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Manage and debug multiple OpenAI Codex OAuth profiles inside OpenClaw, including native multi-profile auth stores and external-router setups where one active…

As a process D 48/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
91
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
48/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 48/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 64 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1280 tokens
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 449: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 17 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 64 items
    • +4Has examples (0 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.