SKILLEMALL.ai

AD phy-pipeline-contract-enforcer

Data pipeline contract enforcer. Define the expected schema at each pipeline stage boundary — field names, types, nullability, value ranges, business invariants — and validate actual data samples against those contracts. Catches schema drift between pipeline stages before it reaches production. Supports dbt models, Spark DataFrames, Pandas DataFrames, Kafka topics, REST API payloads, and raw CSV/JSON files. Can auto-generate a contract from a sample, validate a sample against an existing contract, detect when a contract has been broken by upstream changes, and produce a migration plan to fix violations. Zero external API — pure local file and CLI analysis. Triggers on "pipeline contract", "schema drift", "validate pipeline output", "data contract", "pipeline schema mismatch", "contract enforcement", "/pipeline-contract".

LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills Agent Skills author: LeoYeAI MIT 2 files body ≈ 4 429 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 2 d ago

Data pipeline contract enforcer.

As a process D 48/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

ProcedureInfrastructureData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
48/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 411, 422, 471): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 48/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4429 tokens
    • 100Steps. 12 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Description length 832: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 7 example trigger phrases
    • +4Structure: 17 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 12 items
    • +4Has examples (15 code blocks)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.