SKILLEMALL.ai

AC seek-and-analyze-video

Video intelligence and content analysis using Memories.ai LVMM. Discover videos on TikTok, YouTube, Instagram by topic or creator. Analyze video content, summarize meetings, build searchable knowledge bases across multiple videos. Use for video research, competitor content analysis, meeting notes, lecture summaries, or building video knowledge libraries.

LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills Agent Skills author: LeoYeAI MIT 5 files body ≈ 3 253 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 2 d ago

Video intelligence and content analysis using Memories.ai LVMM. Discover videos on TikTok, YouTube, Instagram by topic or creator. Analyze video content…

As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

AnalyzerYouTubeMedia and videotype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
83
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
52/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "triggers"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 100Steps. 109 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3253 tokens
    • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • -42 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 356: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 34 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 109 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.