BB sergei-mikhailov-tg-channel-reader
Read posts and comments from Telegram channels via MTProto (Pyrogram or Telethon). Fetch recent messages and discussion replies from public or private channels by time window.
Read posts and comments from Telegram channels via MTProto (Pyrogram or Telethon).
As a process B 67/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, running it twice
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.
Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 4
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 4
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcREADME.md:49Writes to a shell startup file> echo 'export PATH="$HOME/.venv/tg-reader/bin:$PATH"' >> ~/.bashrc
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcREADME.md:198Writes to a shell startup fileecho 'export PATH="$HOME/.venv/tg-reader/bin:$PATH"' >> ~/.bashrc
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcREADME.md:204Writes to a shell startup fileecho 'export PATH="$HOME/.local/bin:$PATH"' >> ~/.bashrc
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcSKILL.md:454Writes to a shell startup fileecho 'export PATH="$HOME/.venv/tg-reader/bin:$PATH"' >> ~/.bashrc && source ~/.bashrc
Files scanned: 17. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 67/100
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 16 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, read, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4537 tokens
- 85Steps. 37 steps, 2 vague phrases
- 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 175: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 43 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 37 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (28 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.