AF pharmacoeconomic-evaluation
This skill provides comprehensive guidance and tools for conducting pharmacoeconomic evaluations including cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), cost-utility analysis (CUA), cost-benefit analysis (CBA), budget impact analysis (BIA), sensitivity analysis, and decision-analytic model construction (Markov, decision tree, DES, PSM). Follows ISPOR Good Practices for Outcomes Research Reports. Use this skill for HTA projects, drug pricing, reimbursement decisions, and health economic research.
This skill provides comprehensive guidance and tools for conducting pharmacoeconomic evaluations including cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), cost-utility…
As a process F 29/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/model_methods.md, references/guidelines.md, scripts/example.py
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/model_methods.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/guidelines.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/example.py
Process rating: all ten parameters 29/100
- 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: references/model_methods.md, references/guidelines.md, scripts/example.py
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (pharmacoeconomic-evaluation) differs from the folder (skill-pharmacoeconomic-evaluation)
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4128 tokens
- 85Steps. 177 steps, 3 vague phrases
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 489: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 41 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 177 items
- +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
- +3All 3 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.