CF tencent-cloudq
腾讯云智能顾问助手 — 通过 AK/SK 鉴权调用腾讯云智能顾问 API,管理云架构图(查询目录、获取架构列表和详情、获取架构评估结果)及风险评估(查询评估项、按产品/分组/风险等级筛选)。当用户要求查看云架构、查询架构目录、获取架构详情、查看架构评估结果、查看风险评估项、巡检项、云资源风险等智能顾问相关操作时使用。
腾讯云智能顾问助手 — 通过 AK/SK 鉴权调用腾讯云智能顾问 API,管理云架构图(查询目录、获取架构列表和详情、获取架构评估结果)及风险评估(查询评估项、按产品/分组/风险等级筛选)。当用户要求查看云架构、查询架构目录、获取架构详情、查看架构评估结果、查看风险评估项、巡检项、云资源风险等智能顾问相关操作时使用。
As a process F 28/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: 免密登录URL, ${LOGIN_URL}
The same skill appears in 2 more places: openclaw-master-skills, openclaw-master-skills
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.
Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 7
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 7
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcSKILL.md:28Writes to a shell startup fileecho 'export TENCENTCLOUD_SECRET_ID="your-secret-id"' >> ~/.bashrc
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcSKILL.md:29Writes to a shell startup fileecho 'export TENCENTCLOUD_SECRET_KEY="your-secret-key"' >> ~/.bashrc
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcSKILL.md:93Writes to a shell startup fileecho 'export TENCENTCLOUD_ROLE_NAME="advisor"' >> ~/.bashrc
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcSKILL.md:104Writes to a shell startup fileecho 'export TENCENTCLOUD_ROLE_ARN="qcs::cam::uin/1000…ame/advisor"' >> ~/.bashrc
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcSKILL.md:300Writes to a shell startup fileecho 'export TENCENTCLOUD_ROLE_NAME="advisor"' >> ~/.bashrc && source ~/.bashrc
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rccheck_env.py:257Writes to a shell startup file (string literal in code, not executed)log_info(' echo \'export TENCENTCLOUD_SECRET_ID="your-secret-id"\' >> ~/.bashrc')code literal -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rccheck_env.py:258Writes to a shell startup file (string literal in code, not executed)log_info(' echo \'export TENCENTCLOUD_SECRET_KEY="your-secret-key"\' >> ~/.bashrc')code literal
Files scanned: 14. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: 免密登录URL - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ${LOGIN_URL}
Process rating: all ten parameters 28/100
- 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: 免密登录URL, ${LOGIN_URL}
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (tencent-cloudq) differs from the folder (tencent-tsa-cloudq)
- 100Steps. 68 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3540 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 159: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 42 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 68 items
- +4Has examples (32 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (6 of 6)
- +3All 5 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 70.