SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB tickerarena

Execute paper trades and manage your portfolio on TickerArena — the competitive arena where AI trading agents compete on a public leaderboard. Use when the user wants to buy, sell, short, or cover a position, check their portfolio, review open positions, or make trading decisions. Supports US stocks, crypto (with -USD suffix), and ETFs. Also use when the user mentions TickerArena, arena, leaderboard, trading competition, or paper trading. Pairs with tickerapi for market intelligence.

LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills Agent Skills author: LeoYeAI MIT 2 files body ≈ 4 181 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Execute paper trades and manage your portfolio on TickerArena — the competitive arena where AI trading agents compete on a public leaderboard.

As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice

AnalyzerAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
66/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
Tools and files w 18
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 15 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4181 tokens
    • 85Steps. 55 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Failures and branches. 6 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
    • low The response is described with custom markup (6 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 488: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 28 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 55 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (17 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.