SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC unbrowser

Cheap first-pass web browsing without launching Chrome — fetch SSR pages, follow links, query the DOM, run JS, detect bot-wall challenges. Escalate to OpenClaw's managed browser when the page can't be served headlessly.

LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills Agent Skills author: LeoYeAI MIT 3 files body ≈ 3 312 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Cheap first-pass web browsing without launching Chrome — fetch SSR pages, follow links, query the DOM, run JS, detect bot-wall challenges.

As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

AnalyzerGitHubCloudflareSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
59/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:29
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      - Credential harvesting, scraping login forms for user/password pairs, or authenticating as anyone other than the requesting user.

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 43 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3312 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 219: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 17 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 43 items
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.