SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AD x-twitter-growth

X/Twitter growth engine for building audience, crafting viral content, and analyzing engagement. Use when the user wants to grow on X/Twitter, write tweets or threads, analyze their X profile, research competitors on X, plan a posting strategy, or optimize engagement. Complements social-content (generic multi-platform) with X-specific depth: algorithm mechanics, thread engineering, reply strategy, profile optimization, and competitive intelligence via web search.

LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills Agent Skills author: LeoYeAI MIT 8 files body ≈ 1 998 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

X/Twitter growth engine for building audience, crafting viral content, and analyzing engagement.

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

AnalyzerMarketingData and analyticsPersonal productivitytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 57 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1998 tokens
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 467: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 27 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 57 items
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
    • +3All 5 scripts are documented
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.