BB freehire-search
Use this skill to search live software / tech / data / engineering job listings across many countries and markets (and remote) via the freehire.me aggregator's public API, or to look up a specific posting. It aggregates roles from ~50 ATS platforms into one schema, so a single skill covers many markets — but its faceted filtering (skills, category, seniority) is tuned tech-first, so scope triggers to technical roles. Trigger phrases: find a tech job, software job search, developer jobs, engineering vacancies, data/ML jobs, DevOps roles, remote developer jobs, "are there any <tech role> jobs in <place>", look up this freehire job posting.
Use this skill to search live software / tech / data / engineering job listings across many countries and markets (and remote) via the freehire.me…
As a process B 69/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 16. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "enabled"
Process rating: all ten parameters 69/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Steps. 27 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2507 tokens
- low The response is described with custom markup (11 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 645: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 27 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.