BD azure-external-attack-surface-management
Expert knowledge for Azure External Attack Surface Management development including configuration. Use when filtering EASM inventory by ASN, domains, hosts, IPs, pages, SSL certs, or exporting findings to analytics tools, and other Azure External Attack Surface Management related development tasks. Not for Azure Defender For Cloud (use azure-defender-for-cloud), Azure Security (use azure-security), Azure Sentinel (use azure-sentinel), Azure Networking (use azure-networking).
Expert knowledge for Azure External Attack Surface Management development including configuration.
As a process D 37/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: security.md
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: security.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 37/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: security.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 50Steps. 2 steps
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 748 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3No numbered steps or checklist
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 479: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 4 headings
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.