CF azure-monitor
Expert knowledge for Azure Monitor development including troubleshooting, best practices, decision making, architecture & design patterns, limits & quotas, security, configuration, integrations & coding patterns, and deployment. Use when configuring Log Analytics, Application Insights, Container/VM Insights, autoscale alerts, or OpenTelemetry/Prometheus, and other Azure Monitor related development tasks. Not for Azure Network Watcher (use azure-network-watcher), Azure Service Health (use azure-service-health), Azure Defender For Cloud (use azure-defender-for-cloud), Cost Management (use azure-cost-management).
Expert knowledge for Azure Monitor development including troubleshooting, best practices, decision making, architecture & design patterns, limits & quotas…
As a process F 32/100 · No process to follow — References files that are not bundled: security.md
How to improve
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenconfiguration.md:796High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)| Understand Enri…ogs table schema in Azure Monitor | https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-monitor/reference/tables/enri…ogs |
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenconfiguration.md:1131High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)| Analyze Rapi…ies logs | https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-monitor/reference/tables/rapi…ies |
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenconfiguration.md:1191High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)| Use Wind…ogs table for diagnostics | https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-monitor/reference/tables/wind…ogs |
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 9739 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: security.md - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 95, 223): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 32/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: security.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 30Running it twice. 11 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Execution cost. Instruction body is 9739 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
- 50Steps. 2 steps
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3No numbered steps or checklist
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 617: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 9 headings
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 65.