CF azure-spring-apps
Expert knowledge for Azure Spring Apps development including troubleshooting, best practices, decision making, architecture & design patterns, limits & quotas, security, configuration, integrations & coding patterns, and deployment. Use when configuring ASA networking/security, Tanzu tools, observability/APM, CI/CD deployments, or blue‑green releases, and other Azure Spring Apps related development tasks. Not for Azure App Service (use azure-app-service), Azure Container Apps (use azure-container-apps), Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) (use azure-kubernetes-service), Azure Functions (use azure-functions).
Expert knowledge for Azure Spring Apps development including troubleshooting, best practices, decision making, architecture & design patterns, limits &…
As a process F 34/100 · No process to follow — References files that are not bundled: security.md
How to improve
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 6773 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: security.md - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 61): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 34/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: security.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 30Running it twice. 40 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Steps. 2 steps
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 6773 tokens
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3No numbered steps or checklist
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 610: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 12 headings
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 65.