CC music-video-subtitle-generator
For musicians, video creators, and social-media editors producing AI music videos or emotional short films with lyric typography. Users provide music, lyrics, references, characters, typography direction, mood, or target platform. The Skill analyzes beat and vocal timing, separates character, scene, and text references, designs beat-reactive spatial typography, decomposes long works into connected shots, audits prompts, and routes generation for H3 or other video tools. It outputs MV concepts, shot prompts, lyric text plans, and stitching guidance. Best for stylized MVs and subtitle-driven music visuals, not ordinary caption cleanup, licensed IP copying, or fully manual post-production editing.
For musicians, video creators, and social-media editors producing AI music videos or emotional short films with lyric typography.
As a process C 63/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "trigger-words"
Process rating: all ten parameters 63/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 63 steps
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Failures and branches. 7 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3317 tokens
- low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 703: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 23 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 63 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.