SKILLEMALL.ai

BD nemoclaw-maintainer-refactor-docs

Reorganize NemoClaw documentation pages, navigation, or content ownership while preserving published routes. Use for structural documentation refactors.

NVIDIA/NemoClaw Agent Skills author: NVIDIA Apache-2.0 5 files body ≈ 1 042 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 d ago

Reorganize NemoClaw documentation pages, navigation, or content ownership while preserving published routes.

As a process D 42/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: ../_shared/documentation-writing-review.md

ProcedureSoftware developmentWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
78
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
42/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: ../_shared/documentation-writing-review.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../_shared/documentation-writing-review.md
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 54, 68): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 42/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../_shared/documentation-writing-review.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: ../_shared/documentation-writing-review.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 31 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1042 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 152: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 6 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 31 items
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.