SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC nemoclaw-maintainer-release-notes

Draft a post-tag NemoClaw Announcement from the verified release range and shipped PRs. Use when summarizing a release.

NVIDIA/NemoClaw Agent Skills author: NVIDIA Apache-2.0 1 file body ≈ 2 041 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 d ago

Draft a post-tag NemoClaw Announcement from the verified release range and shipped PRs.

As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: ../_shared/documentation-writing-review.md

AnalyzerGitHubSoftware developmentWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
77
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
56/100
Has gaps
References files that are not bundled: ../_shared/documentation-writing-review.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../_shared/documentation-writing-review.md
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "user_invocable"

Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../_shared/documentation-writing-review.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: ../_shared/documentation-writing-review.md
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 10 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 70Failures and branches. 4 branches
  • 100Steps. 45 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2041 tokens
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 119: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 11 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 45 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.