SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC earth2studio-create-diagnostic

Create Earth2Studio diagnostic model wrappers for single-step data transformations, including simple derived diagnostics, packaged AutoModel diagnostics, and generative or diffusion diagnostics. Do NOT use for prognostic time-stepping models, data sources, or installation. The user may optionally supply a URL or local path to reference material, such as an inference script, repository, paper, or model documentation.

NVIDIA/earth2studio Agent Skills author: NVIDIA 19 files · 10 scripts body ≈ 3 572 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Create Earth2Studio diagnostic model wrappers for single-step data transformations, including simple derived diagnostics, packaged AutoModel diagnostics, and…

As a process C 63/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, running it twice, progress reporting

AnalyzerWriting and documentsSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
93
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
63/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 63/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 14 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 69 steps
    • 100Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3572 tokens
    • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
    • low The response is described with custom markup (10 tags): a typed call is more reliable
    • medium 3 test cases, all positive: not one "should refuse" or "should ask first"

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 419: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 27 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 69 items
    • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 93.