SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC review-github-pr

Review a GitHub pull request by summarizing its diff and key design decisions. Use when the user wants to review a PR, understand changes in a branch, or get a code review summary. Trigger keywords - review PR, review pull request, summarize PR, summarize diff, code review, review branch, PR summary, diff summary.

NVIDIA/openshell Agent Skills author: NVIDIA Apache-2.0 1 file body ≈ 1 989 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 11 h ago

Review a GitHub pull request by summarizing its diff and key design decisions.

As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: <url>, ../../../crates/openshell-crypto/CRYPTO.md

AnalyzerGitHubSoftware developmentWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
60/100
Has gaps
References files that are not bundled: <url>, ../../../crates/openshell-crypto/CRYPTO.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: <url>
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../../crates/openshell-crypto/CRYPTO.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: <url>, ../../../crates/openshell-crypto/CRYPTO.md
  • 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: <url>, ../../../crates/openshell-crypto/CRYPTO.md
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 85Steps. 22 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1989 tokens
  • low The response is described with custom markup (7 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 315: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 18 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 22 items
  • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.