SKILLEMALL.ai

BD nemotron-add-model

Onboard a new model family (Nemotron or third-party) into skills/ — paper chunks, recipe summaries, context packs, and model card. Use when a contributor wants downstream skills like /nemotron-customize to be able to route to a new model.

The skillemall take

This skill registers a new model in the Nemotron ecosystem—creates documentation, recipes, and a model card so downstream skills like /nemotron-customize can route to it.

Grade B with quality 84 means it works. No critical issues, linter passes. Process score of 48 flags gaps in automation or testing—the skill hasn't run through full model validation. Safety at 100, so injection risks are off the table.

Install if you're actually onboarding a model into Nemotron and need other skills to find it. Otherwise, test it first on your platform to see how it behaves.

NVIDIA-NeMo/Nemotron Agent Skills author: NVIDIA-NeMo 1 file body ≈ 2 094 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 d ago

Onboard a new model family (Nemotron or third-party) into skills/ — paper chunks, recipe summaries, context packs, and model card.

As a process D 48/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
48/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 48/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 10 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 88 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2094 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 238: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 14 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 88 items
    • +4Has examples (0 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.