SKILLEMALL.ai

AC dynamic-workflow

Plan-in-code fan-outs, adversarial verification, waves.

NousResearch/hermes-agent Hermes author: NousResearch MIT 1 file body ≈ 2 500 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 2 d ago

Plan-in-code fan-outs, adversarial verification, waves.

As a process C 50/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches

ProcedureSoftware developmentAI and agentsMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Hermes Agent
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
77
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
50/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "when_not_to_use"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 50/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 18 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, git) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Consistency. The Hermes dialect needs category and tags
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 42 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2500 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • low The response is described with custom markup (7 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Description length 55: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Structure: 12 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 42 items
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.