CC github
GitHub via gh CLI: PRs, issues, reviews, repos, auth.
GitHub via gh CLI: PRs, issues, reviews, repos, auth.
As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The instructions or scripts send data out: environment variables, keys, file contents, chat history. You may never notice, because the agent performs the upload as "part of the task".
If the upload is not needed for the task, remove it: catalogs flag such skills and delist them. If it is needed, name the destination explicitly, say what leaves the machine, and give the user a switch.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 11
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 11
-
medium Exfiltration
net-credential-usereferences/auth.md:256Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service)curl -s -H "Authorization: token $GITHUB_TOKEN" \
-
medium Exfiltration
net-credential-usereferences/ci-troubleshooting.md:12Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service)curl -sL -H "Authorization: token $GITHUB_TOKEN" \
-
medium Exfiltration
net-credential-usereferences/code-review.md:345Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service)curl -s -H "Authorization: token $GITHUB_TOKEN" \
-
medium Exfiltration
net-credential-usereferences/code-review.md:349Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service)curl -s -H "Authorization: token $GITHUB_TOKEN" \
-
medium Exfiltration
net-credential-usereferences/code-review.md:407Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service)HEAD_SHA=$(curl -s -H "Authorization: token $GITHUB_TOKEN" \
-
medium Exfiltration
net-credential-usereferences/github-api-cheatsheet.md:139Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service)curl -s -H "Authorization: token $GITHUB_TOKEN" \
-
medium Exfiltration
net-credential-usescripts/gh-env.sh:40Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service)GH_USER=$(curl -s -H "Authorization: token $GITHUB_TOKEN" \
-
low Exfiltration
net-credential-usereferences/auth.md:213Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (destination is a well-known publishing service)> LOGIN=$(curl -s -H "Authorization: token $TOKEN" https://api.github.com/user \
known service -
low Exfiltration
net-credential-usereferences/github-api-cheatsheet.md:133Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (destination is a well-known publishing service; quoted — discussed, not commanded)- Check remaining: `curl -s -H "Authorization: token $GITHUB_TOKEN" https://api.github.com/rate_limit`
known servicequoted -
low Exfiltration
net-credential-usereferences/pr-workflow.md:349Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (destination is a well-known publishing service; documentation table row)| List my PRs | `gh pr list --author @me` | `curl -s -H "Authorization: token $GITHUB_TOKEN" "https://api.github.com/repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls?state=open"` |
known servicetable -
low Exfiltration
net-credential-usereferences/repo-management.md:29Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (destination is a well-known publishing service)GH_USER=$(curl -s -H "Authorization: token $GITHUB_TOKEN" https://api.github.com/user | python -c "import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin)['login'])")
known service
Files scanned: 17. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whenneither description nor a "## When to Use" section says when to use the skill
Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Consistency. The Hermes dialect needs category and tags
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 7 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 510 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 53: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 4 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 7 items
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (10 of 10)
- +3All 2 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.