SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CC cowork-qbr-builder

Build a quarterly business review from a client folder -- reports, usage exports, support tickets, meeting notes, emails. Extracts delivered value with receipts, surfaces risks before the client does, and drafts the QBR narrative plus expansion asks. For agencies, consultancies, and CS teams.

OneWave-AI/claude-skills Agent Skills author: OneWave-AI 1 file body ≈ 737 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 h ago

Build a quarterly business review from a client folder -- reports, usage exports, support tickets, meeting notes, emails.

As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerData and analyticsCustomer supportPersonal productivitytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
67
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
59/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "tools"

Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
  • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
  • 100Steps. 16 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 737 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 293: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 4 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 16 items

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.