SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BB landing-page-copywriter

Writes conversion-focused landing page copy - headlines, subheads, value propositions, feature and benefit blocks, social proof, FAQs, and CTA button text - using PAS, AIDA, or StoryBrand. Use when the user wants words for a landing page, sales page, product or pricing page, waitlist page, homepage hero, or ad-to-page flow, including rewriting weak copy, generating headline or CTA variants for A/B tests, or turning a product description into page sections. Use landing-page-optimizer instead for auditing an existing page's performance, and a frontend skill for building the page itself.

OneWave-AI/claude-skills Agent Skills author: OneWave-AI 3 files body ≈ 1 244 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 h ago

Writes conversion-focused landing page copy - headlines, subheads, value propositions, feature and benefit blocks, social proof, FAQs, and CTA button text -…

As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

GeneratorMarketingWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
66/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 38 steps
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1244 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 591: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 5 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 38 items
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.