SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB sec-filing-puller

Pulls financial statement numbers for US public companies straight from SEC EDGAR's free official XBRL APIs (companyfacts, companyconcept, frames, submissions) into a cited table. Every value carries its accession number, form, fiscal period, filed date, XBRL tag and a link to the filing, and the tool handles fiscal-year ends, quarterly vs YTD vs TTM, derived Q4, restatements and units. Use this whenever the user wants 10-K numbers or 10-Q numbers, says "pull financials for", asks for public company revenue, net income, EPS, cash, debt or capex, wants comps or a competitor side-by-side, a credit check, prospect research, or model inputs, or mentions SEC filings or EDGAR, even if they never say XBRL. Free and primary-source, no paid data terminal needed. Do not use it for private companies, stock prices or valuation multiples.

OneWave-AI/claude-skills Agent Skills author: OneWave-AI 8 files · 3 scripts body ≈ 1 861 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 h ago

Pulls financial statement numbers for US public companies straight from SEC EDGAR's free official XBRL APIs (companyfacts, companyconcept, frames…

As a process B 73/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting

ProcedureFinanceResearchSales and CRMtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
92
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
73/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 73/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 11 steps
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1861 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Description length 837: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +4Structure: 11 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
    • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
    • +3All 2 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 92.