SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BB sow-generator

Generates professional Statements of Work from a project brief. Use when a user needs to create an SOW, scope a project, define deliverables and milestones, or produce a consulting engagement document.

OneWave-AI/claude-skills Agent Skills author: OneWave-AI 7 files body ≈ 1 020 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 h ago

Generates professional Statements of Work from a project brief.

As a process B 75/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, failures and branches, progress reporting

GeneratorSecurityCustomer supporttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
86
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
75/100
Nearly there
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/document-structure.md:290
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      - Vulnerability assessment and penetration testing (if applicable)

    Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "tools"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 75/100

    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
    • 100Steps. 33 steps
    • 100Result and completion. Output format and completion criterion are stated
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1020 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 201: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 6 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 33 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (6 of 6)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 86.