SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC minicpm5-deploy

Pick the right inference backend for a MiniCPM5-1B or MiniCPM5-2B checkpoint and route to a backend-specific cookbook skill. Use when the user wants to deploy / serve / chat-with / benchmark a MiniCPM5 model and has not yet committed to a specific engine, or when they say "deploy MiniCPM5", "run MiniCPM5", "serve MiniCPM5", "MiniCPM5 推理", "部署 MiniCPM5".

OpenBMB/MiniCPM Agent Skills author: OpenBMB Apache-2.0 1 file body ≈ 1 542 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 d ago

Pick the right inference backend for a MiniCPM5-1B or MiniCPM5-2B checkpoint and route to a backend-specific cookbook skill.

As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: ../../docs/deployment/

ProcedureSoftware developmentInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
81
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
52/100
Has gaps
References files that are not bundled: ../../docs/deployment/
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../docs/deployment/

Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../../docs/deployment/
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: ../../docs/deployment/
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 26 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 9 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1542 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 355: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 8 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 9 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.