SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CD code-polish

Polish changed code when the user explicitly asks, or when an active workflow requests post-implementation simplification and risk-profiled review over a fixed file scope.

PaulRBerg/agent-skills Claude Code author: PaulRBerg MIT 11 files body ≈ 1 458 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 3 d ago

Polish changed code when the user explicitly asks, or when an active workflow requests post-implementation simplification and risk-profiled review over a…

As a process D 47/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: references/profiles/<name>.md

ProcedureSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
74
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
47/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: references/profiles/<name>.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/profiles/security.md:8
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)
    - `SEC-002` Broken auth/authz (`CRITICAL`): missing ownership checks, privilege escalation paths, or trust on
    detector

Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/profiles/<name>.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 47/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/profiles/<name>.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: references/profiles/<name>.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 100Steps. 17 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1458 tokens
  • low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 171: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 6 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.