AB spreadsheets
Use when CSV, TSV, or Excel (.xlsx) is the primary input/output: design or review text-table schemas; inspect, transform, validate, convert, or recalc formulas; or create/fix spreadsheets. Do not trigger when tabular data is incidental.
xlsx) is the primary input/output: design or review text-table schemas; inspect, transform, validate, convert, or recalc formulas; or create/fix spreadsheets.
As a process B 68/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, failures and branches, progress reporting
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.
Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-disable-securityreferences/xlsx.md:205Disables a security control (Defender, Gatekeeper, SIP, firewall, execution policy) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)not trash it: `xattr -dr com.apple.quarantine /Applications/LibreOffice.app` (or install with `--no-quarantine`).
quoted
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 68/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 17 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1426 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- low The response is described with custom markup (5 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 236: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 6 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
- +3All 3 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 94.