SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC yeet

Use for GitHub PR/issue/discussion workflows: create/update PRs, issues, or discussions and post issue or discussion comments; triggers include yeet.

PaulRBerg/agent-skills Claude Code author: PaulRBerg MIT 20 files · 3 scripts body ≈ 1 308 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 8 d ago

Use for GitHub PR/issue/discussion workflows: create/update PRs, issues, or discussions and post issue or discussion comments; triggers include yeet.

As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, running it twice

ProcedureGitHubSoftware developmentData and analyticsAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
78
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
58/100
Has gaps
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 20. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "coordination"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "effort"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "skill-dependencies"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100

    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 14 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 75Steps. 3 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1308 tokens
    • low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • -31 of 3 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 149: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 4 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 3 items
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (12 of 14)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.