BB lecture-style
Masterclass lecturing — one continuous explanation carried by slides, with dense pages, long narration that builds an argument across several real cases, and checkpoints that are rare and deliberate. Use when the ask is a lecture, a masterclass, a systematic walkthrough of a subject, 「大师课」「系统讲解」「讲透」, or any topic whose payoff is understanding rather than practice; also use when the user names this style. Not for hands-on training (that is `workshop-style`) and not for a course whose point is manipulating a mechanism (that is `deep-interactive`).
Masterclass lecturing — one continuous explanation carried by slides, with dense pages, long narration that builds an argument across several real cases, and…
As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "title"
Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 17 steps
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1324 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 551: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 8 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.