BC style-clone
Building a new course inside someone else's deck — import the deck as a library of layouts, then produce each page of the new course by copying the layout that fits it and rewriting that copy's content element by element, so the result reads as though the original author made it. Use when the session has an imported deck (or a `.pptx` to import) and the ask is to teach new material in its design — its palette, its typography, its way of dividing a page. Not for a straight import that must stay slide-for-slide identical to the file (that is `pptx-import`), and not for extracting how a teacher speaks from a recording or handout (that is `teacher-style-clone`, which supplies the voice while this one supplies the look; the two compose).
Building a new course inside someone else's deck — import the deck as a library of layouts, then produce each page of the new course by copying the layout…
As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "title"
Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 12 mutating operations with no state check
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4684 tokens
- 100Steps. 36 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 742: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 36 items
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.