BB workshop-style
Hands-on workshop — the learner works through the course instead of watching it, with an exercise or a check every couple of pages, short slides that only set up the next task, guiding narration that asks more than it tells, and a closing page where the pieces come together in one small project. Use when the ask is a workshop, a bootcamp session, 「动手」「实操」「练中学」「边做边学」, or a skill the learner is meant to leave holding; also use when the user names this style. Not for a systematic explanatory course (that is `lecture-style`) and not for occupational procedure training with tools and safety gates (that is `vocational`).
Hands-on workshop — the learner works through the course instead of watching it, with an exercise or a check every couple of pages, short slides that only set…
As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "title"
Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 20 steps
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1371 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 622: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 9 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 20 items
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.