SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD code-reviewer

Code review, implementation review, 源码评审、实现复审。Use when: implementation Candidate 已形成，需要基于已批准需求/设计和精确 Git 边界做首次完整 Code Review 或整改 delta 复审。Do not use for API/HLD/LLD/Test/Runbook review or deployment approval.

TestAny-io/testany-agent-skills Agent Skills author: TestAny-io MIT 48 files · 25 scripts body ≈ 2 776 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 13 h ago

Code review, implementation review, 源码评审、实现复审。Use when: implementation Candidate 已形成，需要基于已批准需求/设计和精确 Git 边界做首次完整 Code Review 或整改 delta 复审。Do not use for…

As a process D 41/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: ../../references/workflow-runtime.md

AnalyzerSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
83
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
41/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: ../../references/workflow-runtime.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 19. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../references/workflow-runtime.md
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 55): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../../references/workflow-runtime.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: ../../references/workflow-runtime.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Steps. 32 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2776 tokens
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -33 of 7 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
  • +3Description length 208: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 13 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 32 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (7 of 9)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.