SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CF code-writer

Implement and troubleshoot code, 源码实现、修复与工程交接。Use when: 已有明确请求或批准范围，需要实现、排障、补测试、整改 Code Review 或恢复这些工作。首次先读本 skill 与小入口，勿在加载 skill 的同批调用中全文输出工程状态。支持长任务及 Writer/Reviewer 协作；不替代专业评审，不授予发布、部署或通信权限。

TestAny-io/testany-agent-skills Agent Skills author: TestAny-io MIT 3 files body ≈ 905 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 12 h ago

Implement and troubleshoot code, 源码实现、修复与工程交接。Use when: 已有明确请求或批准范围，需要实现、排障、补测试、整改 Code Review 或恢复这些工作。首次先读本 skill 与小入口，勿在加载 skill 的同批调用中全文输出工程状态。支持长任务及…

As a process F 33/100 · No process to follow — References files that are not bundled: ../../references/workflow-runtime.md, ../../references/browser-context.md, ../code-reviewer/references/artifact-tools.md

GeneratorSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
68
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
33/100
No process to follow
References files that are not bundled: ../../references/workflow-runtime.md, ../../references/browser-context.md, ../code-reviewer/references/artifact-tools.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../references/workflow-runtime.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../references/browser-context.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../code-reviewer/references/artifact-tools.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../../references/workflow-runtime.md, ../../references/browser-context.md, ../code-reviewer/references/artifact-tools.md
  • 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: ../../references/workflow-runtime.md, ../../references/browser-context.md, ../code-reviewer/references/artifact-tools.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Steps. 11 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 905 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 194: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 6 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 68.