SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CF guardrails-reviewer

Review Project Guardrails, 工程规范评审。Use when: Guardrails 创建或更新后需要作为项目级治理基线做准出，检查触发判定、生成模式、事实标准、下游工作流钩子与规则可执行性。

TestAny-io/testany-agent-skills Agent Skills author: TestAny-io MIT 6 files body ≈ 1 345 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 3 d ago

Review Project Guardrails, 工程规范评审。Use when: Guardrails 创建或更新后需要作为项目级治理基线做准出，检查触发判定、生成模式、事实标准、下游工作流钩子与规则可执行性。

As a process F 33/100 · No process to follow — References files that are not bundled: ../../references/workflow-execution.md, ../../references/review-assurance.md, references/workflow-hooks.md

AnalyzerSoftware developmentData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
33/100
No process to follow
References files that are not bundled: ../../references/workflow-execution.md, ../../references/review-assurance.md, references/workflow-hooks.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../references/workflow-execution.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../references/review-assurance.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/workflow-hooks.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../../references/workflow-execution.md, ../../references/review-assurance.md, references/workflow-hooks.md
  • 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: ../../references/workflow-execution.md, ../../references/review-assurance.md, references/workflow-hooks.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Steps. 91 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1345 tokens
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 108: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 16 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 91 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 4)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.