SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD test-spec-writer

Write test spec, 测试规格/测试用例包撰写。Use when: LLD 完成且测试策略已确认后，需要产出独立测试范围内完整的 test case package、追溯矩阵与执行说明。 也用于既有相关文档的有限增量更新。

TestAny-io/testany-agent-skills Agent Skills author: TestAny-io MIT 5 files body ≈ 2 412 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 4 d ago

Write test spec, 测试规格/测试用例包撰写。Use when: LLD 完成且测试策略已确认后，需要产出独立测试范围内完整的 test case package、追溯矩阵与执行说明。 也用于既有相关文档的有限增量更新。

As a process D 35/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: ../../references/workflow-execution.md, ../../references/document-amendments.md

GeneratorSoftware developmentData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
76
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
35/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: ../../references/workflow-execution.md, ../../references/document-amendments.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../references/workflow-execution.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../references/document-amendments.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../../references/workflow-execution.md, ../../references/document-amendments.md
  • 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: ../../references/workflow-execution.md, ../../references/document-amendments.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Steps. 219 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2412 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (5 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 117: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 25 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 219 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 3)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.