CB lint-tasks
Review existing coder-eval task YAML — find criteria that cannot fail, prompts that leak the answer, and near-duplicate tasks, each with a fix. Read-only. Use when the user wants existing tasks reviewed, linted, audited, or checked for gaps.
Review existing coder-eval task YAML — find criteria that cannot fail, prompts that leak the answer, and near-duplicate tasks, each with a fix.
As a process B 69/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- error
name-missingSKILL.md: frontmatter has no `name` - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "disallowed-tools"
Process rating: all ten parameters 69/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Steps. 25 steps
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2989 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 241: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 10 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 25 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 53.