SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC analyze

Run read-only deep repository analysis and return a ranked synthesis with explicit confidence, concrete file references, and clear evidence-vs-inference boundaries. Use when a user says 'analyze', 'investigate', 'why does', 'what's causing', or needs grounded cross-file explanation before any changes are proposed.

Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex Agent Skills author: Yeachan-Heo MIT 1 file body ≈ 702 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 d ago

Run read-only deep repository analysis and return a ranked synthesis with explicit confidence, concrete file references, and clear evidence-vs-inference…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: ../../templates/AGENTS.md, templates/AGENTS.md

AnalyzerSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
78
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
References files that are not bundled: ../../templates/AGENTS.md, templates/AGENTS.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: analyze (Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex)

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../templates/AGENTS.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: templates/AGENTS.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../../templates/AGENTS.md, templates/AGENTS.md
  • 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: ../../templates/AGENTS.md, templates/AGENTS.md
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 85Steps. 20 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 702 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low The skill ranks results itself: that belongs to the system behind the tool, not the model

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
  • +3Description length 315: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 11 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 20 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.