CD makepad-2.0-splash
CRITICAL: Use for Makepad 2.0 Splash scripting language. Triggers on: splash language, makepad script, script_mod!, makepad scripting, splash 脚本, makepad 2.0 script, mod.state, on_render, script_eval, streaming evaluation, splash syntax, splash vm, let binding, splash functions, hot reload, live reload, ScriptModKey, script_mod_overrides, checkpoint, incremental parsing, canvas splash, POST splash, fn tick, on_audio, set_text, tab switching, 音乐播放器, token monitor, driver script, audio API, 热重载, 脚本引擎, 增量解析
CRITICAL: Use for Makepad 2.0 Splash scripting language. Triggers on: splash language, makepad script, scriptmod!, makepad scripting, splash 脚本, makepad 2.0…
As a process D 42/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: examples/counter/src/app.rs, examples/todo/src/app.rs
How to improve
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
name-formatname should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens) - warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 5942 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: examples/counter/src/app.rs - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: examples/todo/src/app.rs
Process rating: all ten parameters 42/100
- 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: examples/counter/src/app.rs, examples/todo/src/app.rs
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 30Running it twice. 10 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5942 tokens
- 85Steps. 47 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 509: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 40 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 47 items
- +4Has examples (30 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 3)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 57.