CD community-manager
Summary of the [REPLACE: CHANNEL_PLATFORM] channel [REPLACE: CHANNEL_NAME] — top [REPLACE: TOP_N_THREADS] threads + open questions
Summary of the [REPLACE: CHANNELPLATFORM] channel [REPLACE: CHANNELNAME] — top [REPLACE: TOPNTHREADS] threads + open questions
As a process D 45/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
low Exfiltration
net-credential-useSKILL.md:86Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)Telegram, Discord, and Slack all need their bot token in the `Authorization` header. A bare `$TOKEN` on a `curl` line is refused by the Bash permission analyzer — so call `./secretcurl` with a `{ENV_Nquoted
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
frontmatter-yamlSKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 2, column 14: description: Summary of the [REPLACE: CHANNEL_PLATFORM] channel [REPLACE: CHANN… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value - warning
name-formatname should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens) - warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 45/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 17 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1079 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 130: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 4 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 57.