SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC videodb

Ingest, index, search, edit, and monitor video and audio with the VideoDB Python SDK — upload from files, URLs, or RTSP feeds, build spoken and scene indexes with timestamped search and playable clips, transcode and reframe, do timeline edits (subtitles, overlays, dubbing), and run real-time alerts on live streams or desktop capture. Use when working with video search, transcription, clipping, transcoding, streaming, or live video alerts.

affaan-m/ECC Claude Code author: affaan-m MIT 12 files · 1 script body ≈ 3 353 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 h ago

Ingest, index, search, edit, and monitor video and audio with the VideoDB Python SDK — upload from files, URLs, or RTSP feeds, build spoken and scene indexes…

As a process C 63/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting

GeneratorMedia and videotype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
91
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
63/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: videodb (affaan-m/everything-claude-code)

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 12. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 63/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 85Steps. 54 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3353 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 442: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 33 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 54 items
    • +4Has examples (14 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (10 of 10)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.