SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CC inventory-demand-planning

在庫管理、需要予測、補充戦略、およびサプライチェーン最適化。 Codified expertise for demand forecasting, safety stock optimization, replenishment planning, and promotional lift estimation at multi-location retailers. Informed by demand planners with 15+ years experience managing hundreds of SKUs. Includes forecasting method selection, ABC/XYZ analysis, seasonal transition management, and vendor negotiation frameworks. Use when forecasting demand, setting safety stock, planning replenishment, managing promotions, or optimizing inventory levels.

affaan-m/everything-claude-code Agent Skills author: affaan-m MIT 1 file body ≈ 5 907 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 25 h ago

在庫管理、需要予測、補充戦略、およびサプライチェーン最適化。 Codified expertise for demand forecasting, safety stock optimization, replenishment planning, and promotional lift estimation…

As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

AnalyzerData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
57/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: ECC

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 5907 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "origin"

Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 30Running it twice. 14 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5907 tokens
  • 85Steps. 44 steps, 2 vague phrases
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 518: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 27 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 44 items
  • +4Has examples (0 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.