BD energy-procurement
Procure electricity and natural gas for commercial and industrial facilities: tariff and rate-schedule optimization, demand-charge mitigation, supplier RFPs, fixed/index/block-and-index hedging, renewable PPA and REC evaluation, and sustainability reporting. Use when procuring energy, optimizing utility tariffs, managing demand charges, evaluating PPAs, or building energy budgets and hedge strategies.
Procure electricity and natural gas for commercial and industrial facilities: tariff and rate-schedule optimization, demand-charge mitigation, supplier RFPs…
As a process D 48/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
The same skill appears in 1 more place: ECC
How to improve
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 7289 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage"
Process rating: all ten parameters 48/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 43 mutating operations with no state check
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 7289 tokens
- 85Steps. 77 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 404: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 27 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 77 items
- +4Has examples (0 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.