AB ito-baskets
Read-only Itô basket and prediction-market data skill. Index the live basket catalog, compare a basket against user-supplied research or a watchlist, build a source-grounded market brief, or draft a non-executable planning worksheet. Use when a user asks to browse or index Itô baskets, compare a basket against notes or a thesis, research prediction-market events/venues/liquidity, or plan a basket or market idea without trading. Never advises, orders, trades, reserves, or executes.
The skill indexes Itô basket catalogs, compares baskets against user notes, and pulls market data without executing trades. Three modules and a script handle API calls; logic is modular. Sandbox shows the script stays within its directory. Grade A: quality 90, safety 100, no critical issues.
For analysts tracking prediction markets who need quick basket briefings without accidental order risks. Read-only by design—that's the safety net. Install it if you work with Itô or similar venues and want structured research without execution risk.
Read-only Itô basket and prediction-market data skill.
As a process B 70/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 70/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 100Steps. 52 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3169 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 485: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 13 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 52 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 90.
In the sandbox The scripts kept to themselves
The skill's scripts were run in a throwaway machine: no network, fake keys in the home directory, a tracer watching. We wrote down what they did. Reaching for the network or for secrets caps the technical grade at C; a quiet run adds no points.
Запущено 1 скрипт; каждому дали двадцать секунд, поддельный домашний каталог с ключами и сеть, в которой ничего нет.
scripts/ito-baskets.js | ничего за пределами своей папки |
6 Oct 2026