BD repo-scan
Bootstrap pointer that installs the external repo-scan skill from a pinned, reviewable commit. Use when repo-scan must be installed before running its cross-stack source-code asset audit; this ECC pointer does not perform the audit itself.
A bootstrap pointer that installs the external repo-scan tool—it audits source code across your tech stack but doesn't run the audit itself, just pulls the dependency from a pinned commit.
Grade B, no critical issues, code quality at 84. Single file, straightforward logic—just a pointer to an external repo. Safety score 100. Process score sits at 43 because this is a loader, not a full analyzer. Runs on 12 platforms from Claude to DeepSeek.
Install if you're planning to run repo-scan and want a locked version. For a one-off repo check, it's sufficient.
Bootstrap pointer that installs the external repo-scan skill from a pinned, reviewable commit.
As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 8, 144): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 18 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1733 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 239: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 9 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.