SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD vite-patterns

Vite build tool patterns including config, plugins, HMR, env variables, proxy setup, SSR, library mode, dependency pre-bundling, and build optimization. Activate when working with vite.config.ts, Vite plugins, or Vite-based projects.

affaan-m/everything-claude-code Agent Skills author: affaan-m MIT 1 file body ≈ 4 184 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 25 h ago

Vite build tool patterns including config, plugins, HMR, env variables, proxy setup, SSR, library mode, dependency pre-bundling, and build optimization.

As a process D 39/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

GeneratorDockerSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
82
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
39/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: vite-patterns (affaan-m/everything-claude-code)

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 114, 407, 419): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 39/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 11 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4184 tokens
    • 85Steps. 28 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 233: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 39 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 28 items
    • +4Has examples (20 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.