SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BB windows-desktop-e2e

E2E testing for Windows native desktop apps (WPF, WinForms, Win32/MFC, Qt) using pywinauto and Windows UI Automation. Use when writing E2E tests for a Windows native desktop app with pywinauto or UI Automation.

affaan-m/everything-claude-code Agent Skills author: affaan-m MIT 1 file body ≈ 7 518 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 23 h ago

E2E testing for Windows native desktop apps (WPF, WinForms, Win32/MFC, Qt) using pywinauto and Windows UI Automation.

As a process B 65/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, running it twice, progress reporting

ProcedureSoftware developmentInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
74
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
65/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 7518 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 245): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 7518 tokens
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 20 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 17 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 210: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 41 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 20 items
  • +4Has examples (38 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.